So there I was last Tuesday, standing in this quarry outside Spokane, trying not to slip on wet basalt while Jim – the foreman who’s probably been doing this longer than I’ve been alive – explained why they don’t just blast everything to pieces. “These stones want to break a certain way,” he said, and I swear this guy was channeling some kind of geological wisdom as he ran his hand along what would eventually become someone’s foundation. “You work with the grain, not against it.”

That whole conversation has been stuck in my head because it perfectly sums up the battle I’ve been fighting with architects and contractors for… God, must be eight years now? Ever since sustainable building became this trendy thing that everyone claims to care about but nobody wants to actually research properly. We’ve gotten so obsessed with making everything uniform and predictable that we’ve completely forgotten how to work with materials that have, you know, actual personalities.

Why_Im_Done_Fighting_Architects_About_Local_Stone_Spoiler_The_48cf921b-bfed-49e6-99e2-2687439ac243_2

Here’s the thing that drives me absolutely crazy – architects will spend hours researching some exotic manufactured material with impressive recycled content percentages, but mention locally quarried stone and their eyes glaze over like I just suggested we go back to using mud bricks. Stone seems old fashioned, expensive, difficult. And okay, sometimes it is all those things. I’m not going to lie to you. But when you actually run the numbers on environmental impact? Natural stone, especially when it’s sourced regionally, often makes these supposedly “green” manufactured alternatives look like environmental disasters.

Perfect example – I’m consulting on this house in Bellingham right now where the architect originally specified manufactured stone veneer. You know the stuff… cement, aggregates, iron oxide pigments, all molded to look like “natural” stone. Looked great on paper, checked all the usual boxes for durability and cost. But then I did what I always do (and what apparently nobody else bothers with) – I actually calculated the embodied carbon.

Holy hell. That manufactured stone required Portland cement, which if you know anything about cement production, creates massive CO2 emissions. Then it gets manufactured in Georgia – because of course it does – so now we’re shipping fake stone across the entire continent. Plus all those synthetic colorants need high-temperature processing to get that “authentic” look. When I finished crunching numbers, the total embodied energy was roughly three times what local sandstone would require. Three times!

I’ve been testing natural stone applications at my own place for the past year, not because I’m swimming in money (my budget is honestly embarrassing for someone who’s supposed to be an expert), but because I’ve learned to source stone that other people overlook. Remember that basalt from Spokane? They’ve got this whole pile of “waste” pieces that don’t meet standard dimensional requirements. Contractors won’t touch them because they’re not perfectly uniform. But for certain applications? They’re absolutely perfect. I got enough stone for a retaining wall at about forty percent of manufactured costs.

Working with irregular stone teaches you things that manufactured materials just can’t. Every single piece has different density, porosity, colour variations. You can’t install it like tile and expect perfect results – trust me, I learned that the hard way on my first attempt. My neighbour actually asked if I was playing some elaborate jigsaw puzzle because I spent an entire Saturday puzzling over stone placement. In a way, I guess I was. But that process of fitting stones based on their individual characteristics? It creates something that manufactured uniformity absolutely cannot match.

The durability factor is where natural stone really kicks ass, excuse my language. I constantly see manufactured stone veneers failing after ten, maybe fifteen years if they’re lucky. Cracking, delaminating, colours fading to this sad grey that screams “fake material installed by lowest bidder.” Meanwhile, I’m regularly working on restoration projects for stone buildings that have been getting hammered by Pacific Northwest rain for over a century with minimal maintenance. When local stone is properly selected and installed – and that’s the key phrase there – it essentially lasts forever. The embodied energy gets amortized over centuries instead of decades.

Regional stone varieties tell these incredible geological stories if you bother to listen. The volcanic rock we have throughout the Cascade region? It formed during specific eruption events, creating materials that are perfectly adapted to our freeze-thaw cycles and precipitation patterns. Using this stone isn’t just environmentally logical – it’s climatically appropriate in ways that imported materials often aren’t. I’ve seen too many projects using limestone from Texas or granite from Vermont in climates they weren’t evolved for, leading to premature weathering and expensive maintenance problems nobody anticipated.

Sourcing natural stone requires detective work that most builders today aren’t prepared for. You can’t just call up a supplier and order exactly what you need like it’s lumber. I spend time visiting quarries, understanding their extraction methods, learning about overburden and waste streams. Sounds boring, I know, but many quarries have piles of material they consider unusable that work beautifully for specific applications. Building relationships with quarry operators has saved my clients thousands while reducing waste that would otherwise get trucked to landfills.

The installation learning curve is real though, I won’t sugarcoat that. Most masons today learned to work with manufactured materials that install predictably every time. Natural stone requires old-school skills – reading the stone, understanding how different densities affect mortar adhesion, working with irregular dimensions. I’ve watched experienced contractors struggle through their first natural stone project, cursing my name the entire time, then become total converts once they develop the techniques. It’s like learning to cook with actual ingredients instead of processed foods that behave identically.

Cost comparisons aren’t straightforward, which drives contractors crazy because they want simple numbers. Natural stone often costs more upfront for materials and labor, but the lifecycle economics tell a completely different story. Manufactured alternatives require replacement every fifteen to twenty years, while natural stone actually improves with age. I helped one client analyze natural stone foundation versus poured concrete last year. Stone cost thirty percent more initially, but eliminated the need for waterproofing membranes, vapor barriers, and insulation that concrete required. Over the building’s projected lifespan, stone was actually more economical.

Environmental certifications don’t capture natural stone’s benefits well, which is another source of constant frustration in my work. LEED gives credits for recycled content and regional sourcing, but natural stone doesn’t fit neatly into these checkbox categories. It’s not “recycled” because it was never waste to begin with – it’s simply extracted from the ground. But its environmental impact can be dramatically lower than alternatives that score better on certification scorecards. This disconnect between what certification systems reward and actual environmental performance keeps me awake some nights.

I’m particularly excited about reclaimed stone opportunities. Demolition projects generate stone that’s perfect for new applications, often with incredible character that new materials can’t match.

Why_Im_Done_Fighting_Architects_About_Local_Stone_Spoiler_The_48cf921b-bfed-49e6-99e2-2687439ac243_3

I recently helped a client source beautiful sandstone from a 1920s bank renovation for their new home’s foundation. This stone had already served one complete building lifetime and was ready for another century of service. Zero embodied energy from quarrying, amazing weathered character, and cost less than new manufactured alternatives. Win-win-win.

Natural stone isn’t appropriate for every application or budget – I’m not some stone evangelist who thinks it solves everything. But for projects where durability, regional character, and genuine sustainability matter more than initial cost savings, it deserves serious consideration instead of getting dismissed automatically. The key is working with professionals who understand both the material properties and proper installation techniques. Half-hearted attempts with natural stone usually disappoint everyone involved, while thoughtful applications create buildings that feel permanently rooted in their places and climates rather than dropped there by aliens.

Author carl

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *