Standing in the courtyard of Singapore's PARKROYAL Pickering for the third time this month, I find myself doing that thing again – photographing the same green terraces from slightly different angles, as if I might capture some secret I missed before. The security guard who's started recognising me just nods now. Can't blame him for wondering why this American woman keeps coming back to stare at a hotel.
But here's the thing about truly transformative design – it doesn't let you go.
I've been documenting nature-integrated projects for eight years now, and certain buildings keep drawing me back like magnets. Not because they're perfect (they're not), but because they demonstrate something essential about how humans respond when architecture stops fighting against the natural world and starts working with it.
The PARKROYAL isn't just a building with plants stuck on it – though plenty of people make that mistake. What Thomas Heatherwick and WOHA Architects created here is a vertical ecosystem that actually functions. The terraced gardens follow the site's original topography, creating microclimates that support everything from rain trees to climbing vines.
I've watched office workers from neighboring buildings take detours just to walk past these green facades during lunch breaks, often stopping to touch leaves or photograph flowers.
That's the tell – when people go out of their way to interact with a building.
Speaking of going out of your way… I spent six hours on trains last month to visit Stefano Boeri's Bosco Verticale in Milan. Worth every minute of that cramped regional rail car, by the way. Standing at the base of those towers, you're looking up at 900 trees and 20,000 plants creating their own weather patterns. The morning I visited, mist was literally rising from the upper floors as the vegetation transpired.
My Italian isn't great (okay, it's terrible), but I managed to interview Giuseppe, one of the building's maintenance team. Through broken English and enthusiastic hand gestures, he explained how they handle irrigation, pruning, and seasonal plant replacement. What struck me wasn't the technical complexity – though that's impressive – but his genuine pride in the work. "The birds," he kept saying, pointing upward. "So many birds now."
He's right. The towers have become a vertical habitat corridor, attracting species that hadn't been seen in central Milan for decades. That's not just an architectural achievement – it's ecological restoration in three dimensions.
But you don't need 80 million euros and a team of arborists to create meaningful connections between people and nature. Some of the most effective biophilic interventions I've encountered happen on shoestring budgets with massive heart.
Take the Maggie's Centre in Kirkcaldy, Scotland, designed by Zaha Hadid. I know, I know – Hadid isn't exactly known for earthy, nature-friendly designs. But this cancer care centre wraps around existing trees like water flowing around stones, creating these incredible moments where interior spaces suddenly open to reveal ancient oaks growing right through the building. The effect is startling and somehow deeply comforting.
I spent an afternoon there talking with patients and staff. One woman, receiving her second round of chemotherapy, described sitting in the main lounge watching squirrels in the oak branches. "It reminds you there's still normal life happening," she said. "That you're still part of it."
That's what good biophilic design does – it doesn't just provide views of nature, it reintegrates you into natural systems and cycles.
You Might Also Like
The Japanese figured this out centuries ago, of course. I finally made it to the Naoshima Contemporary Art Museum last spring, where Tadao Ando carved spaces into hillsides so carefully that you're never quite sure where the building ends and the landscape begins. Walking through the underground galleries, you encounter these perfect rectangular apertures that frame specific views – a pine branch against sky, stones arranged around a water feature, seasonal plantings that change the emotional tone of each space throughout the year.
It's the opposite of those generic "nature wall graphics" you see in corporate offices. Instead of representing nature, Ando's architecture becomes a lens for experiencing it more intensely.
But here's what really gets me excited these days – seeing these principles applied to everyday buildings by architects who'll never win a Pritzker Prize. There's a elementary school in Copenhagen where Bjarke Ingels Group created what they call a "mountain school" – essentially turning the building itself into a landscape that kids can climb, explore, and inhabit in ways traditional school architecture never allows.
I visited during recess and watched children scrambling up grass-covered slopes that double as walls, finding hidden nooks created by the building's topography. Teachers told me they've noticed improved focus in classrooms and decreased behavioral issues since the school opened. Makes sense – when your environment encourages natural movement and exploration during breaks, sitting still for lessons becomes easier.
The magic isn't in any single design element but in the integrated approach. Natural materials, varied ceiling heights that mirror forest canopies, classrooms that spill directly onto planted terraces, water features that mask traffic noise and create natural gathering spots. Each component reinforces the others.
That's something I've learned from studying projects across six continents now – successful biophilic design isn't about adding plants to conventional buildings. It's about rethinking fundamental assumptions about how buildings should relate to natural systems.
Van Dusen Botanical Garden Visitor Centre in Vancouver demonstrates this beautifully.
The roof literally disappears into surrounding meadows, making the building almost invisible from certain angles. Inside, the structure follows the natural drainage patterns of the site, with water flowing through the building during heavy rains (this is Vancouver, after all). Visitors often comment that they feel like they're walking through a natural landscape that happens to have interior spaces, rather than touring a building with garden views.
What fascinates me most about these global examples isn't their diversity of approaches – though that's remarkable – but their consistent impact on human behavior. Whether it's office workers lingering longer in naturally lit lobbies in Seattle, hospital patients requiring less pain medication in rooms with garden views in Sweden, or students showing improved test scores in classrooms with living walls in Mexico City, the pattern holds across cultures and climates.
We're not talking about minor improvements here. These are significant, measurable changes in how people function physically and psychologically. That's not architectural theory – it's biological reality.
After documenting hundreds of these projects, I've become convinced that integrating nature into our built environments isn't an aesthetic choice or environmental luxury. It's a fundamental requirement for human wellbeing that we've somehow forgotten in our rush to seal ourselves inside climate-controlled boxes.
The buildings that keep drawing me back – from Singapore's green towers to Scotland's cancer centres – all share one quality: they make visitors feel more alive. Not through sensory overload or dramatic gestures, but by reconnecting us to the natural processes we're still, despite everything, part of.
That's worth a few extra train rides to experience firsthand.
