# The Ultimate Biophilic Buildings: Our Crew Ranks the World’s Most Nature-Forward Spaces
Right, so we finally sat down and thrashed this out. Took us four sessions, countless coffees, and nearly resulted in Jeff storming off when we didn’t rank The Edge higher. But here it is: our definitive ranking of the world’s most impressive biophilic buildings.
We’re not talking about buildings that just stuck a few plants in the lobby and called it green. These are spaces where nature isn’t decoration, it’s integral to how the building functions and how people experience it. From hospitals that actually heal faster to offices that boost productivity, these buildings prove that biophilic design isn’t just trendy architecture – it’s scientifically backed design that measurably improves human wellbeing.
The criteria? We looked at innovation, scale, measurable impact on occupants, integration of natural elements, and whether the design actually delivers on biophilic principles rather than just looking pretty. Sarah kept pushing for places with proper research backing their claims, while Tom was adamant about including spaces that regular people can actually visit and experience. Dr. Priya Kapoor insisted we consider the medical and psychological evidence, and Jeff… well, Jeff wanted everything to be ranked by how many sensors it had.
Some surprises in our final list? The Barbican Conservatory punching way above its weight despite being nearly 40 years old. One Central Park Sydney making the top three when we initially thought it was all style over substance. And yes, before you ask, we did seriously consider including shopping centres and airports – turns out some of the most innovative biophilic design is happening in commercial spaces.
## 1. Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
**Healthcare | CPG Consultants**
Winner of the inaugural Stephen R. Kellert Biophilic Design Award (2017) | Serves over 550,000 people in northern Singapore | Design goal explicitly included lowering blood pressure on entry | 795 beds with “hospital in a garden, garden in a hospital” concept
**What makes it untouchable**
“This one’s not even close for me,” says Dr. Priya Kapoor. “When you’ve got a hospital where patients genuinely recover faster because of how it’s designed, that’s biophilic design proving its worth in the most critical environment possible.”
The numbers back her up. Khoo Teck Puat Hospital serves more than 550,000 people across northern Singapore (KTPH Corporate Profile), but it’s the only hospital we know where the design brief explicitly stated the goal of lowering visitors’ blood pressure upon entry (International Living Future Institute). The “hospital in a garden, garden in a hospital” concept isn’t marketing speak – it’s an integrated approach where the adjacent Yishun Pond becomes part of the therapeutic environment.
Tom was initially skeptical: “Hospitals are meant to be sterile, right?” But the evidence is compelling. This building won the first-ever Stephen R. Kellert Biophilic Design Award in 2017, beating entries from the US and Japan (The Straits Times). It’s not just about having gardens – it’s about proving that biophilic design can deliver measurable health outcomes in the most demanding environment.
**Does it still hold up?**
Absolutely. Opened in 2010, it’s still being cited as the gold standard for healing environments. The fact that it explicitly tied landscape design to wellbeing outcomes makes it more relevant now as we better understand the science behind biophilic design. If anything, other hospitals are still trying to catch up to what Singapore achieved over a decade ago.
We covered the full impact in our detailed analysis of how this hospital proved nature heals patients faster.
## 2. Jewel Changi Airport, Singapore
**Transportation Hub | Safdie Architects**
World’s tallest indoor waterfall at 40 metres | Houses over 2,000 trees and palms across 21,000+ sqm | 135,700 sqm floor area | Features 280 stores and opened to 17 million visitors annually
**What makes it untouchable**
“Right, hear me out,” Tom argued during our second session. “This is basically a shopping centre in an airport. How’s that biophilic?” But by the end of our discussion, we were all convinced. Jewel Changi isn’t just impressive – it’s revolutionary in how it reimagines what transit spaces can be.
The stats are staggering. The HSBC Rain Vortex is officially the world’s tallest indoor waterfall at 40 metres (Jewel Changi Airport Media Release). But it’s the scale of the living systems that’s most impressive – over 2,000 trees and palms, plus more than 10,000 shrubs across more than 21,000 square metres (Jewel Changi Airport).
Sarah made the crucial point: “This proves biophilic design works at massive scale. We’re talking about 135,700 square metres where biophilia isn’t an add-on feature – it’s the central organising principle.” Moshe Safdie’s design puts nature at the heart of one of the world’s busiest airports, transforming what’s typically a stressful transit experience into something restorative.
**Does it still hold up?**
Since opening in 2019, it’s become the template for next-generation airport design. The efficient displacement ventilation system integrated with the living elements shows this isn’t just spectacle – it’s smart environmental design. Other airports are scrambling to figure out how to incorporate similar biophilic elements.
Our full examination of what makes Jewel Changi a biophilic masterpiece goes deeper into the technical innovations.
## 3. One Central Park, Sydney
**Mixed-Use Development | Ateliers Jean Nouvel with Patrick Blanc**
Won MIPIM award for Best Innovative Green Building | Largest green facade in Australia | Features mirror heliostat system reflecting light to lower levels | Described as one of Sydney’s most significant urban infill developments
**What makes it untouchable**
This was our biggest debate. Jeff initially dismissed it as “fancy plant wallpaper,” but Sarah fought hard for its inclusion, and she was right. Patrick Blanc’s vertical gardens here aren’t just decorative – they’re integrated into a sophisticated system that includes mirror heliostats to reflect light onto lower levels (THURSD).
The project won the MIPIM award for Best Innovative Green Building (Vertical Garden Patrick Blanc), and for good reason. This is the largest green facade in Australia, but more importantly, it demonstrates how vertical gardens can be engineered solutions rather than just aesthetic ones. The living wall system works in conjunction with the building’s environmental controls.
“Look, I was skeptical too,” admits Sarah. “But when you see how the facade panels and planting systems are documented and maintained, this is serious botanical engineering, not just sticking plants on walls.”
**Does it still hold up?**
The project remains one of the most technically sophisticated green facades globally. The integration of Jean Nouvel’s architectural vision with Blanc’s botanical expertise created something that’s both visually striking and environmentally functional. Other projects are still trying to match its integration of living systems with building performance.
Sarah explored the technical details in our deep dive into the science behind Patrick Blanc’s living walls.
## 4. Apple Park, California
**Corporate Campus | Foster and Partners**
Largest LEED Platinum office building in North America at 2.8 million sq ft | 17 megawatt onsite solar installation plus 4 MW biogas fuel cells | Natural ventilation reduces HVAC needs for 9 months annually | 9,000 trees across 175-acre campus
**What makes it untouchable**
“Steve Jobs was obsessed with every detail, and it shows,” Dr. Priya Kapoor noted. Apple Park isn’t just big – it’s the largest LEED Platinum office building in North America at 2.8 million square feet (WorldGBC). But size isn’t what earned it this ranking.
The natural ventilation system reduces HVAC requirements for about 9 months of the year (Fracttal). That’s not just environmental performance – it’s biophilic design integrated with building systems. The 9,000 trees across the 175-acre campus (Wired) create microclimates that support the natural ventilation strategy.
Tom was impressed by the commitment: “When you’re Apple and you could build anything, choosing to make nature central to your headquarters says something. This isn’t greenwashing – it’s 17 megawatts of solar power and 4 megawatts of biogas fuel cells backing up the environmental claims.”
**Does it still hold up?**
The building opened in 2017 and remains the gold standard for corporate biophilic design. Other tech companies are still trying to match its integration of natural systems with cutting-edge building technology. The fact that it operates on 100% renewable energy while maintaining those natural ventilation systems proves the concept works at scale.
Dr. Priya Kapoor detailed the obsessive design process in our analysis of Apple Park’s biophilic vision.
## 5. Amazon Spheres, Seattle
**Workplace | NBBJ**
Houses over 40,000 plants representing more than 1,000 species | 3,045 individual glass panes in exterior glazing | 620 tons of structural steel in pentagonal hexecontahedron geometry | Tropical cloud forest conservation focus
**What makes it untouchable**
“This is what happens when you have Amazon money and a genuine commitment to biophilic design,” Tom observed. The Spheres contain over 40,000 plants representing more than 1,000 species of cloud forest plants (Seattle Spheres). But it’s not just a greenhouse – it’s a working office environment that demonstrates how radically we can rethink workplace design.
The technical achievement is impressive: 3,045 individual glass panes forming the exterior (Magnusson Klemencic Associates), 620 tons of structural steel in a pentagonal hexecontahedron geometry (Magnusson Klemencic Associates). This isn’t just ambitious architecture – it’s precision engineering to create optimal growing conditions for cloud forest species.
Jeff appreciated the innovation: “The computational design to generate the steel and glass structure shows this is serious technical work, not just a novelty.”
**Does it still hold up?**
Opened in 2018, it’s still unique globally. No one else has attempted to create a working office environment inside what’s essentially a conservatory at this scale. The focus on tropical cloud forest conservation adds scientific credibility to what could have been just corporate showing off.
Tom covered the engineering challenges in our exploration of how Amazon brought a rainforest into the office.
## 6. The Edge, Amsterdam
**Office Building | PLP Architecture**
BREEAM score of 98.36% (highest ever recorded) | 30,000 sensors integrated with nearly 6,500 connected LED luminaires | 40,000 m² gross floor area across 15 floors | Rainwater reuse system for toilets and irrigation
**What makes it untouchable**
Jeff was adamant this should be higher: “98.36% BREEAM score! That’s the highest ever recorded!” He’s not wrong. The Edge achieved a BREEAM NL score that’s essentially perfect (EDGE Technologies). The building uses 30,000 sensors integrated with nearly 6,500 connected LED luminaires (Philips Lighting Case Study).
You Might Also Like
But here’s where it gets interesting from a biophilic perspective: those sensors don’t just control lighting – they create responsive environments that adapt to occupant needs in real-time. The rainwater reuse system supports both toilets and landscape irrigation (BRE Group), integrating natural water cycles into the building’s operations.
“It’s the smartest building on earth,” Sarah noted, “but the biophilic elements are more subtle than the other projects. The intelligence serves human comfort, which is ultimately what biophilic design is about.”
**Does it still hold up?**
Completed in 2014, it’s still the benchmark for smart building technology. Other projects have tried to match its sensor integration and environmental responsiveness, but none have achieved that BREEAM score. It proves that biophilic design doesn’t always need to be about visible plants – it can be about creating environments that respond to human needs like natural systems do.
Jeff detailed the technical systems in our analysis of why The Edge is called the smartest green building on earth.
## 7. Bosco Verticale, Milan
**Residential Towers | Stefano Boeri Architetti**
Won CTBUH Best Tall Building Worldwide 2015 | Houses 730 trees, 5,000 shrubs, and 11,000 perennials | Twin towers reach 116m and 84m | Described as model for metropolitan reforestation
**What makes it untouchable**
“This changed everything,” Sarah argued. “Before Bosco Verticale, vertical forests were theoretical. After 2014, everyone wanted one.” The project won CTBUH Best Tall Building Worldwide in 2015 (Stefano Boeri Architetti), and for good reason.
The scale is unprecedented: 730 trees, 5,000 shrubs, and 11,000 perennials and groundcover plants across the facades of twin towers at 116m and 84m tall (Wikipedia). But it’s not just about the numbers – it’s about proving the concept works in practice. CTBUH praised the vegetation “at scale and height” (ArchDaily).
Tom was initially concerned: “All those plants must be a maintenance nightmare.” But the project has operated successfully for nearly a decade, proving the systems work. It’s described as “a model for metropolitan reforestation” (Stefano Boeri Architetti), and that’s exactly what it’s become.
**Does it still hold up?**
Absolutely. Opened in 2014, it’s still the reference point for vertical forest projects globally. Cities worldwide are commissioning their own versions. The fact that it’s residential rather than commercial proves biophilic design can work in everyday living environments, not just showcase projects.
Jeff covered the engineering reality in our examination of why vertical forests actually work.
## 8. The Barbican Conservatory, London
**Cultural Institution | Chamberlin, Powell and Bon**
London’s second-largest greenhouse covering 23,000 square feet | Houses around 1,500 species including rare and endangered plants | Built on top of theatre fly tower | Planted between 1980-1981, opened 1984
**What makes it untouchable**
“This is the dark horse,” Sarah insisted. “Everyone expects biophilic design to be new and flashy. The Barbican Conservatory proves the principles worked 40 years ago.” Covering about 23,000 square feet, it’s often described as London’s second-largest greenhouse (Time Out).
But here’s what makes it special: it houses around 1,500 species of plants and trees (Barbican), including rare and endangered species. Built on top of the theatre fly tower (Wikipedia), it’s an ingenious use of brutalist architecture to create unexpected natural space.
“It’s basically a secret jungle in the middle of London,” Tom pointed out. “If that’s not biophilic design, I don’t know what is.”
**Does it still hold up?**
Better than ever. Planted between 1980-1981 and opened in 1984, it proves that well-designed biophilic spaces improve with age. The fact that it still draws visitors and supports rare species after four decades shows the staying power of good design. Modern projects are trying to recreate what the Barbican achieved in the early 1980s.
Sarah explored its hidden impact in our piece on the Barbican Conservatory and hidden nature in brutalist London.
## 9. Maggie’s Centres Network, UK
**Healthcare Support | Various Architects**
24 centres across the UK and 3 in Europe | Founded in response to clinical treatment environments | Natural light and uplifting environments as core design principles | Multiple award-winning architects including Foster, Hadid, and Libeskind
**What makes it untouchable**
“These buildings actually matter,” Dr. Priya Kapoor argued passionately. The Maggie’s network includes 24 centres in the UK and 3 in Europe (The Times), all designed around the principle that environment affects healing.
Founded in response to “dispiriting clinical treatment spaces” (ScienceDirect), each centre is designed as an “uplifting non-clinical space” (Architizer) that combines gardens, private rooms, and gathering areas.
“The fact that multiple world-class architects have contributed shows this isn’t just charity work – it’s serious architecture addressing real human needs,” Sarah noted. The centres involve 17 different architects including Foster, Hadid, and Libeskind, all working to the same brief prioritizing natural light and connection to landscape.
**Does it still hold up?**
More relevant than ever. As we better understand the connection between environment and wellbeing, the Maggie’s approach looks increasingly prescient. Started with the first centre in Edinburgh in 1996, the network continues to grow because the model works.
Sarah detailed their approach in our analysis of how Maggie’s Centres use nature to support cancer patients.
## 10. 1 Hotel Brooklyn Bridge, New York
**Hospitality | Various (Part of Larger Development)**
LEED Gold certified 194-room property | Uses 100% wind power energy | Reclaimed materials from Domino Sugar Factory | Stormwater runoff reduced by more than 50% | Part of 550,000 sf development on Pier 1
**What makes it untouchable**
Tom fought for this inclusion: “Hotels are where most people experience biophilic design. If we’re talking about real-world impact, hospitality matters.” The 1 Hotel Brooklyn Bridge is a 194-room property that achieved LEED Gold certification (Architizer) while using 100% wind power energy.
What makes it special is the integration of sustainable materials with biophilic principles. The hotel uses reclaimed wood from the Domino Sugar Factory and repurposed shipping pallets (1 Hotels). The project reduced stormwater runoff by more than 50% (Hotel Designs).
“It’s part of a 550,000 square foot development on Pier 1,” Jeff noted. “The scale and location between Brooklyn Heights Promenade and the Bridge make it significant urban infill.”
**Does it still hold up?**
The 1 Hotels brand has become the template for sustainable luxury hospitality. Opened in 2017, it’s still setting standards for how hotels can integrate biophilic design with genuine environmental performance. Other hotel groups are copying the model.
Tom covered the hospitality impact in our exploration of 1 Hotel Brooklyn Bridge and biophilic design in hospitality.
## Almost Made the Cut
**Singapore Botanic Gardens’ Learning Forest** – Tom was gutted this didn’t make it. Incredible integration of education with biophilic principles, but it’s more landscape architecture than building design. On another day, this could have been top five.
**The Living Building at Georgia Institute of Technology** – Dr. Priya Kapoor pushed hard for this one. Living Building Challenge certification and serious research backing, but it’s still too new to see long-term impact. Cheque back in five years.
**Amazon Biospheres in Berlin** – Jeff’s personal favourite that we left out. Similar concept to Seattle but smaller scale. The original Spheres were more innovative and had bigger cultural impact.
**VIA 57 West, New York** – Sarah lobbied for this BIG-designed pyramid with integrated courtyards and green space. Impressive, but the biophilic elements feel more like amenities than integral design features.
**Parkroyal on Pickering, Singapore** – Nearly made it for the sky gardens and green facades. Stunning visually, but we couldn’t find the hard data on occupant wellbeing that pushed other projects higher.
## What This Ranking Tells Us
Looking at our final list, a few patterns emerge. First, the most successful biophilic buildings integrate natural elements with building systems rather than treating them as decoration. Second, Asia is absolutely leading this space – three of our top four are in Singapore, and there’s a reason for that. Third, the buildings that prove their impact through research and measurement consistently ranked higher than those that just look good.
The biggest surprise? How much the older projects like the Barbican Conservatory and Maggie’s Centres punched above their weight. Good biophilic design is timeless – it’s based on how humans naturally respond to environmental cues, not architectural trends.
Jeff’s still convinced The Edge should be higher, Sarah thinks we undervalued the Maggie’s Centres, Tom reckons Jewel Changi is tourism fluff, and Dr. Priya Kapoor maintains that anything without health outcome data shouldn’t crack the top five.
Think we got it wrong? Yeah, probably on at least two of these. Let us know which ones you’d move around – just remember, we spent four sessions arguing about this already, so bring evidence.
